e are relative RPATHs which are a
*               SECURITY risk
*    0x0008 ... the special '$ORIGIN' RPATHs are appearing after other
*               RPATHs; this is just a minor issue but usually unwanted
*    0x0010 ... the RPATH is empty; there is no reason for such RPATHs
*               and they cause unneeded work while loading libraries
*    0x0020 ... an RPATH references '..' of an absolute path; this will break
*               the functionality when the path before '..' is a symlink
*          
*
* Examples:
* - to ignore standard and empty RPATHs, execute 'rpmbuild' like
*   $ QA_RPATHS=$(( 0x0001|0x0010 )) rpmbuild my-package.src.rpm
* - to check existing files, set $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and execute check-rpaths like
*   $ RPM_BUILD_ROOT=<top-dir> /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths
*  
*******************************************************************************
ERROR   0020: file '/usr/lib64/libubsan.so.1.0.0' contains a runpath referencing '..' of an absolute path [/usr/lib/../lib64/lp64d]
*******************************************************************************
*
* WARNING: 'check-rpaths' detected a broken RPATH OR RUNPATH and will cause
*          'rpmbuild' to fail. To ignore these errors, you can set the
*          '$QA_RPATHS' environment variable which is a bitmask allowing the
*          values below. The current value of QA_RPATHS is 0x0000.
*
*    0x0001 ... standard RPATHs (e.g. /usr/lib); such RPATHs are a minor
*               issue but are introducing redundant searchpaths without
*               providing a benefit. They can also cause errors in multilib
*               environments.
*    0x0002 ... invalid RPATHs; these are RPATHs which are neither absolute
*               nor relative filenames and can therefore be a SECURITY risk
*    0x0004 ... insecure RPATHs; these are relative RPATHs which are a
*               SECURITY risk
*    0x0008 ... the special '$ORIGIN' RPATHs are appearing after other
*               RPATHs; this is just a minor issue but usually unwanted
*    0x0010 ... the RPATH is empty; there is no reason for such RPATHs
*               and they cause unneeded work while loading libraries
*    0x0020 ... an RPATH references '..' of an absolute path; this will break
*               the functionality when the path before '..' is a symlink
*          
*
* Examples:
* - to ignore standard and empty RPATHs, execute 'rpmbuild' like
*   $ QA_RPATHS=$(( 0x0001|0x0010 )) rpmbuild my-package.src.rpm
* - to check existing files, set $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and execute check-rpaths like
*   $ RPM_BUILD_ROOT=<top-dir> /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths
*  
*******************************************************************************
ERROR   0020: file '/usr/lib/gcc/riscv64-redhat-linux/12/plugin/libcc1plugin.so.0.0.0' contains a runpath referencing '..' of an absolute path [/usr/lib/../lib64/lp64d]
ERROR   0020: file '/usr/lib/gcc/riscv64-redhat-linux/12/plugin/libcp1plugin.so.0.0.0' contains a runpath referencing '..' of an absolute path [/usr/lib/../lib64/lp64d]
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QM15M7 (%install)
RPM build warnings:
    line 336: It's not recommended to have unversioned Obsoletes: Obsoletes: libmudflap
    line 337: It's not recommended to have unversioned Obsoletes: Obsoletes: libmudflap-devel
    line 338: It's not recommended to have unversioned Obsoletes: Obsoletes: libmudflap-static
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QM15M7 (%install)
Child return code was: 1
EXCEPTION: [Error()]
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 93, in trace
    result = func(*args, **kw)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 600, in do_with_status
    raise exception.Error("Command failed: \n # %s\n%s" % (command, output), child.returncode)
mockbuild.exception.Error: Command failed: 
 # bash --login -c /usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb --target riscv64 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/gcc.spec